RI-25-03: U.S 58 (Clarksville Bypass) - Town of Clarksville
Intersection of U.S. 58 (Clarksville Bypass) and U.S. 15 (Virginia Avenue)
Project Purpose
The purpose of this study is to evaluate cost-effective alternatives that address the identified VTrans needs (safety, corridor preservation, and access) at the intersection of U.S. 58 (Clarksville Bypass) and U.S. 15 (Virginia Avenue). The study location has been identified in VTrans as a Distressed area.
Survey
The Phase 2 survey regarding proposed alternatives for the intersection of the Clarksville Bypass and Virginia Avenue in the Town of Clarksville was completed in March 2026. The study team will use the input obtained from the public as it refines the alternatives and performs planning-level cost estimation before selecting the preferred alternative(s) to address the identified needs.
Study Partners
- Town of Clarksville
- Mecklenburg County
- Southside Planning District Commission
Key Points of Contact
District Lead: Liz McAdory and Kathryn Benedict
Lead Consultant: Sachin Katkar
Schedule
Start date: March 2025
End date: August 2026
Study Documents
| Dates | Number of Participants (unique individuals) |
|---|---|
|
May 12-31, 2025
|
1,239 |
| The following needs have been identified for this study. Do you agree with these needs? | |
|---|---|
| Safety | 97% |
| Capacity preservation (keep traffic flowing smoothly) | 73% |
| Industrial and Economic Development Area (IEDA) | 34% |
| Transportation demand management (TDM) | 34% |
| Rank the following needs in order of importance to you along the study area. | |
|---|---|
| Corridor safety / intersection safety | 88% |
| Reducing traffic congestion | 77% |
| Proper pavement marking and signage | 69% |
| Speeding / aggressive driving | 68% |
| Pedestrian safety and accessibility | 54% |
| Public transit access and service | 53% |
| Bicycle safety and accessibility | 50% |
| Which of the following safety issues concern you? | |
|---|---|
| Side-impact crashes | 64% |
| Speeding / aggressive driving | 55% |
| Sudden stopping / rear-end crashes | 44% |
| Inadequate pavement marking and signage | 42% |
| Inadequate lighting | 31% |
| Difficulty weaving / merging | 30% |
| Running red lights | 13% |
| Other | 11% |
| Lack of sidewalks / missing sidewalks | 10% |
| Insufficient / missing crosswalks and pedestrian signal timing | 10% |
| Inadequate bicycle facilities | 7% |
| Lack of ADA ramps and accessibility | 4% |
| Closely spaced driveways | 3% |
| Inadequate transit / bus stops | 2% |
| What mobility issues do you typically experience when using the study area? | |
|---|---|
| Difficulty making left turns | 26% |
| Poor signal coordination | 50% |
| Lack of turn lanes | 37% |
| Other | 20% |
| Difficulty accessing businesses | 13% |
| Vehicles blocking entrances | 27% |
| Difficulty when riding a bicycle | 7% |
| Difficulty when walking | 10% |
| What mode(s) of travel do you use when traveling along the study area? | |
|---|---|
| Personal vehicle | 99% |
| Truck or commercial vehicle | 8% |
| Cycling | 3% |
| Walking | 3% |
| Other | 2% |
| Carpool / Vanpool | 1% |
| Metro bus, local bus, or commuter bus | 0% |
| Taxi / Uber / Lyft | 0% |
RI-25-03 Phase 1 Executive Summary - PDF, 1.3MB
The Phase 2 survey regarding proposed alternatives for the intersection of U.S. 58 (Clarksville Bypass) and U.S. 15 (Virginia Avenue) in the Town of Clarksville was completed in March 2026.
| Dates | Number of Participants (unique individuals) |
|---|---|
|
March 5-19, 2026
|
177 |
Alternative 1: Two-Way Stop along U.S. 58 and U.S. 15
The following proposed improvements would reduce speed-related crashes and improve driver decision making by reducing the number of decisions that need to be made. This includes:
- Relocating stop signs at the intersection of U.S. 58 and U.S. 15 to stop traffic along U.S. 15 instead of U.S. 58
- Relocating the overhead caution lights to be positioned before the intersection, where drivers have clear line of sight as they drive up to the intersection.
Please rate Alternative 1, proposing a two-way stop control along U.S. 58 and U.S. 15. (157 responses)
| 1. Strongly oppose | 2. Somewhat oppose | 3. Neutral | 4. Somewhat support | 5. Strongly support | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate the concept on a scale of 1 to 5. | 43% | 15% | 18% | 14% | 10% |
Alternative 2A: Intersection Tightening with Two-Way Stop along U.S. 58 and U.S. 15
The following proposed improvements will reduce speed-related crashes and improve driver decision making by reducing the number of decisions that need to be made. This includes:
- Adding raised medians
- Extending curbs
- Reducing the width of the intersection
- Enhancing intersection lighting
- Eliminating the left turn lane along U.S. 58 and U.S. 15
- Improving driver visibility and line of sight by gently straightening the right turn lane
- Relocating the overhead caution lights to be positioned before the intersection, where drivers have clear line of sight as they drive up.
Please rate Alternative 2A, proposing intersection tightening with a two-way stop along U.S. 58 and U.S. 15. (125 responses)
| 1. Strongly oppose | 2. Somewhat oppose | 3. Neutral | 4. Somewhat support | 5. Strongly support | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate the concept on a scale of 1 to 5. | 30% | 16% | 18% | 23% |
14% |
Alternative 2B: Intersection Tightening with Two-Way Stop along U.S. 58 and U.S. 15
The following proposed improvements will reduce speed-related crashes and improve driver decision making by reducing the number of decisions that need to be made. This includes:
- Relocating the stop sign to U.S. 58 and U.S. 15
- Adding raised medians
- Extending curbs
- Reducing the width of the intersection
- Enhancing intersection lighting
- Eliminating the left turn lane along U.S. 58 and U.S. 15
- Improving driver visibility and line of sight by gently straightening the right turn lane
- Relocating the overhead caution lights to be positioned before the intersection, where drivers have clear line of sight as they drive up.
Please rate Alternative 2B, proposing intersection tightening with a two-way stop along U.S. 58 and U.S. 15. (115 responses)
| 1. Strongly oppose | 2. Somewhat oppose | 3. Neutral | 4. Somewhat support | 5. Strongly support | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate the concept on a scale of 1 to 5. | 40% | 19% | 11% | 18% | 11% |
Alternative 3: Intersection Tightening with All-Way Stop
The following proposed improvements will reduce speed-related crashes and improve driver decision making by reducing the number of decisions that need to be made. This includes:
- Converting the existing two-way stop to an all-way stop
- Adding raised medians
- Extending curbs
- Reducing the width of the intersection
- Enhancing intersection lighting
- Eliminating the left turn lane along U.S. 58 and U.S. 15
- Improving driver visibility and line of sight by gently straightening the right turn lane
- Relocating the overhead caution lights to be positioned before the intersection, where drivers have clear line of sight as they drive up.
Please rate Alternative 3, proposing intersection tightening with an all-way stop control. (117 responses)
| 1. Strongly oppose | 2. Somewhat oppose | 3. Neutral | 4. Somewhat support | 5. Strongly support | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate the concept on a scale of 1 to 5. | 44% | 10% | 11% | 15% | 20% |
Alternative 4: Thru-Cut along U.S. 58 and Intersection Tightening
The following proposed improvements will reduce speed-related crashes and improve driver decision making by reducing the number of decisions that need to be made. This includes:
- Eliminating the through movement along U.S. 58
- Adding raised medians
- Extending curbs
- Reducing the width of the intersection
- Enhancing intersection lighting
- Eliminating the left turn lane along U.S. 58 and U.S. 15
- Improving driver visibility and line of sight by gently straightening the right turn lane
- Relocating the overhead caution lights to be positioned before the intersection, where drivers have clear line of sight as they drive up.
Please rate Alternative 4, proposing a thru-cut along U.S. 58 with intersection tightening. (114 responses)
| 1. Strongly oppose | 2. Somewhat oppose | 3. Neutral | 4. Somewhat support | 5. Strongly support | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate the concept on a scale of 1 to 5. | 68% | 8% | 12% | 9% | 3% |
Alternative 5A: U.S. 58 Closure with Intersection Tightening and Stop Control along U.S. 15
The following proposed improvements will reduce speed-related crashes and improve driver decision making by reducing the number of decisions that need to be made. This includes:
- Closing the southern leg of the intersection (U.S. 58)
- Adding stop control along U.S. 15 only
- Adding raised medians
- Extending curbs
- Reducing the width of the intersection
- Enhancing intersection lighting
- Eliminating the through lane along U.S. 15
- Improving driver visibility and line of sight by gently straightening the right turn lane
- Relocating the overhead caution lights to be positioned before the intersection, where drivers have clear line of sight as they drive up.
Please rate Alternative 5A, proposing the closure of the southern leg of U.S. 58 with intersection tightening and stop control along U.S. 15. (115 responses)
| 1. Strongly oppose | 2. Somewhat oppose | 3. Neutral | 4. Somewhat support | 5. Strongly support | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate the concept on a scale of 1 to 5. | 70% | 9% | 7% | 6% | 9% |
Alternative 5B: U.S. 58 Closure with Intersection Tightening and All-Way Stop
The following proposed improvements will reduce speed-related crashes and improve driver decision making by reducing the number of decisions that need to be made. This includes:
- Closing the southern leg of the intersection (U.S. 58)
- Adding all-way stop control
- Adding raised medians
- Extending curbs
- Reducing the width of the intersection
- Enhancing intersection lighting
- Eliminating the through lane along U.S. 15
- Improving driver visibility and line of sight by gently straightening the right turn lane
- Relocating the overhead caution lights to be positioned before the intersection, where drivers have clear line of sight as they drive up.
Please rate Alternative 5B, proposing the closure of the southern leg of U.S. 58 with intersection tightening and all-way stop control. (114 responses)
| 1. Strongly oppose | 2. Somewhat oppose | 3. Neutral | 4. Somewhat support | 5. Strongly support | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate the concept on a scale of 1 to 5. | 73% | 11% | 8% | 4% | 5% |
Last updated: April 22, 2026
