Dates	Number of Participants (unique individuals)
June 2-16, 2025	333

 

The following needs have been identified for this study. Do you agree with these needs?
Safety	87%
Capacity preservation (keep traffic flowing smoothly)	78%
Transportation demand management (TDM)	57%

 

Rank the following needs in order of importance to you along the study area.
Corridor safety / Intersection safety	90%
Speeding / aggressive driving	81%
Reducing traffic congestion	81%
Proper pavement marking and signage	77%

 

Which of the following safety issues concern you?
Speeding / aggressive driving	64%
Sudden stopping / rear-end crashes	47%
Difficulty weaving / merging	47%
Side-impact crashes	37%
Closely spaced driveways	30%
Inadequate pavement marking and signage	29%
Inadequate lighting	29%
Other	13%

 

What mobility issues do you typically experience when using the study area?
Difficulty making left turns	56%
Lack of turn lanes	44%
Difficulty accessing businesses	28%
Poor signal coordination	27%
Vehicles blocking entrances	15%
Other	11%
Difficulty when riding a bicycle	9%
Difficulty when walking	8%

 

What mode(s) of travel do you use when traveling along the study area?
Personal vehicle	99%
Truck or commercial vehicle	8%
Walking	3%
Cycling	3%
Other	3%
Carpool / Vanpool	2%
Taxi / Uber / Lyft	0%
Metro bus, local bus, or commuter bus	0%

 

CU-25-02 Phase 1 Executive Summary - PDF, 600KB

The Phase 2 survey regarding proposed alternatives for the U.S. 29 (James Monroe Highway) corridor between the Madison County line and the U.S. 29 Business (Madison Road) interchange in Culpeper County was completed in November 2025.

Dates	Number of Participants (unique individuals)
November 7-21, 2025	154

Alternative 1: Implement Reduced Conflict Intersections at Reva Road and White Shop Road

Alternative 1 would implement Reduced Conflict Intersections (RCIs), also referred to as Restricted Crossing U-turns (RCUTs), at Route 633 (Reva Road) and Route 603 (White Shop Road). An RCI is an intersection design that improves safety and reduces delays. Instead of turning left or going straight from a side street, drivers will first turn right onto the main road and then use a dedicated U-turn to complete the desired movement. This design reduces the most dangerous types of collisions.

The proposed alternative would improve safety and sight distance for vehicles attempting left turns onto U.S. 29 by redirecting the movements to RCIs. It also improves safety for vehicles entering Reva Road and White Shop Road from U.S. 29.

Please rate Alternative 1 on a scale of 1 to 5. (1= Strongly oppose; 5= Strongly support)

	1. Strongly oppose	2. Somewhat oppose	3. Neutral	4. Somewhat support	5. Strongly support
Implementation of a Reduced Conflict Intersection at U.S. 29 and Reva Road	23%	10%	15%	22%	30%
Implementation of a Reduced Conflict Intersection at U.S. 29 and White Shop Road	17%	11%	17%	23%	32%

Alternative 2: Add Offset Right-Turn Lane on U.S. 29 South at Reva Road

Alternative 2 would add an offset right-turn lane on U.S. 29 South at Reva Road and close the median crossover at the intersection of U.S. 29 and Reva Road. The proposed alternative would improve safety by increasing the sight distance for vehicles turning right onto U.S. 29 from Reva Road.

Please rate Alternative 2 on a scale of 1 to 5. (1= Strongly oppose; 5= Strongly support)

	1. Strongly oppose	2. Somewhat oppose	3. Neutral	4. Somewhat support	5. Strongly support
Addition of an Offset Right-Turn Lane on U.S. 29 South at Reva Road	12%	9%	10%	31%	38%
Closure of the Median Crossover at the Intersection of U.S. 29 and Reva Road	35%	14%	9%	17%	25%

Alternative 3: Add Acceleration Lane and Extend Right-Turn Lane on U.S. 29 North at White Shop Road

Alternative 3 would add an acceleration lane on U.S. 29 North for vehicles turning right from White Shop Road and extend the right-turn lane on U.S. 29 North for vehicles turning right onto White Shop Road. The proposed alternative would address safety issues with rear-end crashes by allowing for heavy vehicles to safely enter and exit White Shop Road.

Please rate Alternative 3 on a scale of 1 to 5. (1= Strongly oppose; 5= Strongly support)

	1. Strongly oppose	2. Somewhat oppose	3. Neutral	4. Somewhat support	5. Strongly support
Addition of an Acceleration Lane on U.S. 29 North for Vehicles Turning Right from White Shop Road	9%	6%	13%	21%	50%
Extension of the Right-Turn Lane on U.S. 29 North for Vehicles Turning Right onto White Shop Road	9%	3%	10%	24%	53%