Skip to main content

CU-25-01: U.S. Route 29 - Albemarle County

CU2501 Overview Map

I-64 Interchange (Exit 118) to north of Fontaine Avenue Interchange

Project Purpose

The study area includes U.S. Route 29 from Teel Lane to north of the Fontaine Avenue interchange. Three previous projects have been funded related to this area: removing the loop ramp from U.S. Route 29 southbound to I-64 eastbound to eliminate weaving on I-64 (constructed); adding a choice exit lane to the northbound Fontaine Avenue interchange; and relocating the left-turn movement from U.S. Route 29 northbound to I-64 westbound (funded through SMART SCALE Round 5) through the Fontaine Avenue interchange. As part of the removal of the loop ramp, the southbound to eastbound movement is now being made via left turns from U.S. Route 29 southbound to get onto I-64 eastbound facilitated by a signal and a short, double left-turn lane. Traffic is currently backing up at that signal, and there are significant safety concerns at that location as a result. This study will also look to improve the small park and ride lot located on the east side of U.S. Route 29 northbound just south of the interchange on Teal Lane.

Survey

The Phase 2 survey regarding proposed alternatives for the U.S. 29 corridor between Route 1106 (Teel Lane) — near the Interstate 64 interchange at exit 118 — to north of the Fontaine Avenue interchange in Albemarle County was completed in November 2025. The study team will use the input obtained from the public as it refines the alternatives and performs planning-level cost estimation before selecting the preferred alternative(s) to address the identified needs.

Study Partners

  • Albemarle County
  • Charlottesville-Albemarle Metropolitan Planning Organization
  • Jaunt
  • Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT)

Key Points of Contact

District Lead: Charles Proctor and Sandy Shackelford

Lead Consultant: Dan Goldfarb

Schedule

Start date: March 2025

End date: August 2026

Study Documents

Dates Number of Participants (unique individuals)
June 2-16, 2025
450

 

The following needs have been identified for this study. Do you agree with these needs?
Capacity preservation (keep traffic flowing smoothly) 91%
Safety 88%
Transportation demand management (TDM) 67%

 

Rank the following needs in order of importance to you along the study area.
Reducing traffic congestion 96%
Corridor safety / Intersection safety 90%
Speeding / aggressive driving 82%
Proper pavement marking and signage 81%

 

Which of the following safety issues concern you?
Sudden stopping / rear-end crashes 80%
Difficulty weaving / merging 65%
Speeding / aggressive driving 54%
Running red lights 29%
Side-impact crashes 29%
Inadequate pavement marking and signage 28%
Inadequate lighting 20%
Inadequate transit / bus stops 10%
Other 7%
Closely spaced driveways 6%

 

What mode(s) of travel do you use when traveling along the study area?
Personal vehicle 99%
Truck or commercial vehicle 5%
Taxi / Uber / Lyft 2%
Walking 2%
Cycling 2%
Carpool / Vanpool 2%
Other 1%
Metro bus, local bus, or commuter bus 1%

 

Last updated: November 24, 2025

Alert Icon

Please note that this file is not ADA compliant. Choose one of below options: