BR-25-03: Route 67 - Town of Richlands

BR2503 Overview Map

At U.S. Route 460 ramps

Project Purpose

This study will address safety, congestion mitigation, and transportation demand management (TDM) needs along Route 67, specifically at the Route 460 Exit 2 ramps. Study elements will include, but will not be limited to interchange reconfiguration, intersection geometric improvements, and other traffic improvements. The study will also address safety concerns along Front Street and 2nd Street, including vehicle speeds and pedestrian accommodations. The project recommendations that come from this study will be developed into funding applications for SMART SCALE Round 7.

Survey

The Phase 1 survey regarding current transportation needs on Route 67, specifically at the Route 460 Exit 2 ramps, and along Front Street and 2nd Street was completed in June 2025. The study team will use the input obtained from the public to better focus on solutions and develop alternatives to address the identified needs.

Study Partners

  • Town of Richlands
  • Cumberland Plateau Planning District Commission
  • Four County Transit

Key Points of Contact

District Lead: Blake Ailor, Michael James, and Samantha Mullins

Lead Consultant: Chris Daily

Schedule

Start date: March 2025

End date: August 2026

Study Documents

Dates Number of Participants (unique individuals)
May 27-June 10, 2025
250

 

The following needs have been identified for the area on Route 67 at the Route 460 Exit 2 ramps. Do you agree with these needs?
Safety improvement  100%

 

Rank the following needs in order of importance to you for the area on Route 67 at the Route 460Exit 2 ramps.
Corridor safety / intersection safety 66%
Reducing traffic congestion 71%
Proper pavement marking and signage 78%
Pedestrian safety and accessibility 64%
Speeding / aggressive driving 60%
Public transit access and service 57%
Bicycle safety and accessibility  53%

 

Which of the following safety issues concern you for the area on Route 67 at the Route 460 Exit 2ramps?
Inadequate pavement marking and signage 51%
Speeding / aggressive driving 46%
Sudden stopping / rear-end crashes 35%
Lack of sidewalks / missing sidewalks  34%
Insufficient / missing crosswalks and pedestrian signal timing 33%
Inadequate lighting 30%
Difficulty weaving / merging 27%
Side-impact crashes 26%
Inadequate bicycle facilities  16%
Lack of ADA ramps and accessibility 13%
Inadequate transit / bus stops 8%
Closely spaced driveways 8%
Running red lights 7%
Other 4%

 

What mobility issues do you typically experience when using the area on Route 67 at the Route 460 Exit 2 ramps?
Difficulty making left turns 43%
Lack of turn lanes 39%
Poor signal coordination  35%
Difficulty when walking 26%
Vehicles blocking entrances 23%
Difficulty accessing businesses 17%
Difficulty when riding a bicycle 17%
Other 11%

 

What mode(s) of travel do you use when traveling in the area on Route 67 at the Route 460 Exit 2 ramps?
Personal vehicle 99%
Walking 99%
Truck or commercial vehicle 7%
Cycling 5%
Carpool / Vanpool 1%
Regional transit 1%
Other 1%
Taxi / Uber / Lyft 0%

 

The following needs have been identified for the study areas along Front Street and 2nd Street. Do you agree with these needs?
Safety improvement  82%
Congestion mitigation 61%
Transportation demand management (TD) 48%

 

Rank the following needs in order of importance to you for the study areas along Front Street and 2nd Street.
Proper pavement marking and signage 74%
Pedestrian safety and accessibility 71%
Corridor safety / intersection safety 67%
Reducing traffic congestion 65%
Bicycle safety and accessibility  59%
Speeding / aggressive driving 57%
Public transit access and service 54%

 

Which of the following safety issues concern you for the study areas along Front Street and 2nd Street?
Inadequate pavement marking and signage 63%
Insufficient / missing crosswalks and pedestrian signal timing 55%
Speeding / aggressive driving 48%
Lack of sidewalks / missing sidewalks  43%
Sudden stopping / rear-end crashes 35%
Lack of ADA ramps and accessibility 28%
Inadequate lighting 27%
Difficulty weaving / merging 26%
Inadequate bicycle facilities  24%
Inadequate transit / bus stops 20%
Side-impact crashes 18%
Running red lights 17%
Closely spaced driveways 10%
Other 2%

 

What mobility issues do you typically experience when using the study areas along Front Street and 2nd Street?
Difficulty accessing businesses 53%
Lack of turn lanes 40%
Vehicles blocking entrances 38%
Poor signal coordination  35%
Difficulty when walking 29%
Difficulty making left turns 29%
Difficulty when riding a bicycle 15%
Other 9%

 

What mode(s) of travel do you use when traveling in the study areas along Front Street and 2nd Street?
Personal vehicle 98%
Walking 17%
Truck or commercial vehicle 13%
Cycling 4%
Carpool / Vanpool 3%
Regional transit 1%
Taxi / Uber / Lyft 0%
Other 0%

 

Last updated: June 17, 2025

Alert Icon

Please note that this file is not ADA compliant. Choose one of below options: